[ LA HABRA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2024 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 100 EAST LA HABRA BOULEVARD LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631 Please note that should all business not be concluded by 10:00 p.m., the Chair shall either authorize an extension of time to said meeting or continue all unfinished items to a future meeting, date certain, or date uncertain.]
[00:00:03]
ALRIGHT, AT THIS TIME IT'S REALLY LOUD.
AT THIS TIME WILL THE MEETING WILL PLEASE COME TO ORDER? WILL THE AUDIENCE PLEASE STAND AND JOIN MYSELF AND THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE? READY? BEGIN PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE REPUBLIC FOR RICHARD ONE NATION UNDER INDIVISIBLE WITH LIBERTY JUSTICE FOR ALL.
WILL THE SECRETARY PLEASE CALL RULE CHAIR MANLEY.
AND LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT COMMISSIONER GOMEZ HAS AN EXCUSED ABSENCE THIS EVENING.
WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SHALL BE RECEIVED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE GOVERNING BODY MEETING AND LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL WITH A TOTAL TIME LIMIT OF 30 MINUTES FOR ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS UNLESS OTHERWISE MODIFIED BY THE CHAIR.
SPEAKING TIME MAY NOT BE GRANTED IN OUR LOAN TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL FOR PURPOSES OF EXTENDING AVAILABLE SPEAKING TIME AND COMMENTS MUST BE KEPT BRIEF, NON-REPETITIVE, AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE.
THE JOURNAL PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING ALLOWS THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS ANY ITEM OF CITY BUSINESS NOT APPEARING ON THE SCHEDULED AGENDA PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 5 4 9 5 4 0.3 A.
SUCH COMMENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONDED TO BY THE GOVERNING BODY DURING THE MEETING.
DO WE HAVE ANYONE HERE THIS EVENING THAT WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON THE ITEMS, ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR, OR ANY ITEM NOT APPEARING ON THE AGENDA? SEEING NONE WILL CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
ALL MATTERS ON CONSENT CALENDAR ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE AND WILL BE ENACTED BY ONE MOTION UNLESS A COMMISSIONER CITY STAFF MEMBER OR MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE REQUESTS SEPARATE ACTION OR REMOVAL OF AN ITEM REMOVED.
ITEMS WILL BE CONSIDERED FOLLOWING THE CONSENT CALENDAR PORTION OF THIS AGENDA.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL WITH A TOTAL TIME LIMIT OF 30 MINUTES PER ITEM THAT HAS BEEN REMOVED FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION UNLESS OTHERWISE MODIFIED BY THE CHAIR.
SPEAKING TIME MAY NOT BE GRANTED IN OUR LOAN TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL FOR PURPOSES OF EXTENDING AVAILABLE SPEAKING TIME AND COMMENTS MUST BE KEPT BRIEF, NON-REPETITIVE, AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE BEFORE THE COMMISSION AT THIS TIME IS THE CONSENT CALENDAR, WHICH INCLUDES ITEMS ONE THROUGH THREE.
ALL ITEMS WILL BE APPROVED WITH ONE VOTE UNLESS AN ITEM IS REMOVED.
FOR FURTHER DISCUSSION, DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS WISH TO REMOVE AN ITEM? OKAY, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WISHES TO HAVE AN ITEM REMOVED? DON'T SEE ANY
WHO DO WE HAVE A MOTION? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
IS THERE A SECOND? I SECOND THAT MOTION.
MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY VICE-CHAIRMAN MACHA AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARDENAS.
EVERYONE PLEASE ENTER YOUR VOTE.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR THIS EVENING.
THE PROCEDURES WILL BE AS FOLLOWS.
THE CHAIR WILL INTRODUCE THE ITEM AND THEN STAFF WILL GIVE A REPORT ON THE ITEM.
THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE ITEM WILL BE RECOGNIZED FIRST AND THEN THE COMMISSION WILL HEAR FROM THOSE IN OPPOSITION.
REBUTTALS WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED AND THE COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS THE MATTER AND TAKE ANY ACTIONS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD AND LEAVE IT AT THE LECTERN.
WHEN YOU COME FORWARD TO SPEAK, YOU'LL FIND THE SPEAKER'S CARDS ON THE TABLE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE CHAMBER.
WHEN YOU COME FORWARD, PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND SPELL YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS TO THE CHAIR.
THERE SHOULD BE NO DIRECT EXCHANGE BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL WITH A TOTAL TIME LIMIT OF 60 MINUTES FOR ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS.
FOR EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ON THE AGENDA, UNLESS MODIFIED BY THE CHAIR, COMMENTS MUST BE KEPT BRIEF, NON-REPETITIVE AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE.
TONIGHT'S FIRST PUBLIC HEARING ITEM IS CONTINUATION OF A REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION 24 DASH 0 0 5 TO AMEND PLANNED COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PRECISE PLAN 10 DASH ZERO ONE TO WIDEN AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND MAKE SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR DIRECT TRUCK ACCESS AT 1 1 1 1 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD.
DID WE RECEIVE ANY CORRESPONDENCE FOR THIS ITEM? NO, WE DID NOT.
MR. CHAIR, COULD WE PLEASE HAVE A STAFF REPORT?
[00:05:01]
GOOD EVENING.MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, I'LL KEEP THIS SHORT AND BRIEF WHILE STAFF NOTICE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR TONIGHT.
THE APPLICANT RECENTLY PROVIDED STAFF WITH UPDATED PLANS REGARDING THE PROPOSED TRUCK ACCESS AND THEREFORE WE'RE REQUESTING ADDITIONAL TIME TO REVIEW THE NEW INFORMATION THAT CONCLUDES STAFF'S REPORT.
SO JUST FOR CLARIFICATION'S SAKE, WE UH, CAN CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THAT.
I THINK TECHNICALLY YOU'RE JUST CLOSING.
YOU'RE ASKING IF ANYONE'S HERE TO SPEAK ON IT.
I THINK THAT'S YOUR TYPICAL PRACTICE AND THEN YOU'RE CLOSING IT FOR TONIGHT, BUT YOU'RE OUT TECHNICALLY CONTINUING THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE TONIGHT THAT WISHES TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OR AGAINST, UM, THIS ITEM? IF SO, PLEASE COME FORWARD NOW.
I WILL CALL ON THE PLANNING COMMISSIONERS FOR ANY DISCUSSION OR A MOTION.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION APPROVING A CONTINUANCE TO THE JANUARY 13TH, 2025 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING FOR MODIFICATION 24 DASH 0 0 0 5 TO WIDEN AN EXISTING DRIVEWAY AND MAKE SITE IMPROVEMENTS IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE DIRECT TRUCK ACCESS AT 1 1 1 1 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? I SECOND.
MOTION HAS BEEN MADE BY CHAIR MANLEY AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARDENA.
EVERYONE PLEASE ENTER YOUR VOTES.
OUR NEXT PUBLIC HEARING ITEM THIS EVENING IS DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 24 DASH 0 0 0 3 TO REPOSITION A COMMON LOT LINE BETWEEN TWO CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AND IDAHO STREET.
PARCEL NUMBER IS 0 1 8 3 9 1 3 7 AND 0 1 8 3 9 1 3 8.
DID WE RECEIVE ANY CORRESPONDENCE FOR THIS ITEM? NO WE DID NOT.
MR. CHAIR, COULD WE PLEASE HAVE OUR STAFF REPORT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
CHAIR ASH SAYED, SENIOR PLANNER.
GOOD EVENING PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.
AS YOU MENTIONED, UH, THE TWO PROPERTIES INVOLVED IN THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE LAHABRA MARKETPLACE SHOPPING CENTER AT THE, AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF IDAHO STREET AND IMPERIAL HIGHWAY.
SOME OF THE NOTABLE BUSINESSES ON THE PARCELS INCLUDE THE KRISPY KREME STORE THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION IHOP, WENDY'S HOBBY LOBBY SPROUTS, AND THE REGAL MOVIE THEATER.
WE'LL CALL APN ZERO 1-839-ONE-DASH THREE SEVEN PARCEL ONE AND APN ZERO 1-839-ONE-DASH THREE EIGHT PARCEL TWO.
THE PROPERTY OWNER WHO OWNS BOTH PARCELS HAS PROPOSED A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT TO RELOCATE THE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE AS SHOWN HERE AND SITUATE THE REGAL THEATER BUILDING ON THE NEW PARCEL ONE WITH THE INTENT TO SELL IT.
THE PROPERTY OWNER INTENDS TO USE THE FUNDS TO FOR UPKEEP OF THE REST OF THE EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER.
CURRENTLY THE TWO PARCELS ARE 1.84 ACRES AND 15 POINT 13 ACRES RESPECTIVELY.
THE PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT WILL INCREASE THE LOT SIZE OF PARCEL ONE TO 6.17 ACRES WHILE REDUCING PARCEL TWO TO 10.81 ACRES.
WITH THE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, THE TWO PARCELS WILL REMAIN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, AS WELL AS PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITH THE EXISTING SHARED PARKING AND RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENTS.
BASED ON THESE LOGISTICS STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE THE PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT.
STAFF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.
AT THIS TIME I'LL TURN TO THE COMMISSIONERS, UH, IF THEY DO HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF COMMISSIONER RAMS LAND.
SO THE, UM, PLAN FOR THE SHOW'S, UM, I FORGET WHAT EXHIBIT NUMBER IT WAS.
SHOWS, UH, THE LOT PROPOSED LOT LINES CUTTING PARKING SPACES IN HALF, BUT IT ALSO DOESN'T REFLECT THE ACTUAL SITE PLAN OF THAT WAS APPROVED FOR THE KRISPY KREME.
SO WHAT'S KIND OF GOING ON THERE? ARE WE CUTTING PARKING SPACES IN HALF FOR UH, NO.
SO I MEAN, SO THE, THE PLANS THAT WERE SUBMITTED, YOU'RE CORRECT, THEY DON'T SHOW KRISPY KREME, BUT WHERE KRISPY KREME IS BEING CONSTRUCTED,
[00:10:01]
WHICH IS, I DON'T HAVE A POINTER HERE.UM, IT'S, IT'S NOT ON A LOT LINE.
IT'S FULLY WITHIN, UM, WHAT'S GO, WHAT'S GOING TO BE PARCEL TO, AND THE PARKING THAT'S, UH, REQUIRED FOR KRISPY KREME IS AVAILABLE ON THE SITE.
AND THEN THERE'S STILL THAT RECIPROCAL, UM, OR THAT SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARCELS.
WELL, NO, I I DON'T, MAYBE YOU DIDN'T UNDERSTAND MY QUESTION.
I UNDERSTAND ALL OF THAT ABOUT SHARED PARKING, BUT TYPICALLY WHEN YOU DO A LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT, YOU MANEUVER IT AROUND PARKING SPACES.
YOU DON'T CUT THEM IN HALF DOWN THE MIDDLE.
'CAUSE THAT USUALLY CAUSES PROBLEMS LATER ON DOWN THE LINE.
SO SINCE THIS MAP DOESN'T ACTUALLY REFLECT THE APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR KRISPY KREME, MY QUESTION IS, ARE WE CUTTING THE PARKING SPACES IN HALF OR DOES OR THEY MATCH SQUARELY WITH THE NEW PLAN THAT KRISPY KREME THAT WAS WE APPROVED.
COMMISSIONER RAMSON, JUST FOR, FOR MY OWN UNDERSTANDING ON THE DIAGRAM THAT WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US ARE, ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT THAT RED LOT LINE JUST KIND OF GOING NORTH AND SOUTH RIGHT THROUGH THOSE PARKING SPACES? WELL, THE GREEN ONE AND THE RED ONE BOTH GO THROUGH A COUPLE SPACES.
A COUPLE OF THE DRY VILES, THEY GO THROUGH THE MIDDLE OF DIAGONAL SPACES AND I'M, I'M ASSUMING SINCE THE REST OF THE MAPS MADE GREAT, UM, EFFORT TO NOT DO THAT ANYWHERE ELSE, THAT THIS PARTICULAR SECTION DOESN'T ACTUALLY REFLECT WHAT'S BEEN APPROVED FOR THE KRISPY KREME.
SO THAT'S JUST MY CONCERN ABOUT, ABOUT THAT.
UM, SO YOU'RE SAYING THAT, LET'S SEE THE DIAGONAL SPACES THAT FOR WHAT YOU COULD SEE AS THAT, UH, THE GREEN LINE THAT GOES DOWN THE MIDDLE MM-HMM
UM, YOU'RE COMPLETELY INTERSECT CERTAIN PARKING SPACES, RIGHT? YEAH.
THE ONES JUST, WELL IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE, THE, THE LAST EXHIBIT IN THAT SHOWS IT THERE, UM, IT'S FORWARD.
I'M ASSUMING THE PARKING CONFIGURATION ISN'T LIKE THAT AT ALL, JUST BECAUSE DUE TO THE SHAPE OF THE BUILDING THEY'RE CONSTRUCTING RIGHT NOW, THEY MUST HAVE REARRANGED THE, THE PARKING TO, TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEW BUILDINGS.
WELL, TO YOUR POINT, COMMISSIONER RAMSON, EVEN IF IT'S NOT HAPPENING THERE ON THE LEFT SIDE TO THE LEFT OF THE THEATER IN BETWEEN THE LE THE THEATER AND SPROUTS, I THINK YOUR POINT IS, CAN YOU GO BACK ASH TO THAT? YEAH.
SO THAT GREEN LINE BETWEEN THE THEATER AND SPROUTS, KIND OF AS IT'S DRAWN HERE, GOES RIGHT THROUGH, GOES THROUGH THE MIDDLE, THE MIDDLE OF THAT AISLE.
IT DOESN'T CUT SPACES IN HALF.
IT LOOKS LIKE IT'S CUTTING THOSE SPACES IN HALF ACTUALLY.
IT IT GOES RIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE SPACES, SPACES NOT ON THE IPAD, NOT WHAT I'M LOOKING AT.
I MEAN, JUST IMMEDIATELY TO THE LEFT OF THE THEATER.
GOING RIGHT THROUGH THE PARKING SPACES.
RIGHT THROUGH THE PARKING SPACES.
SO NOW MAYBE THESE GREEN LINES THAT WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT ARE, ARE NOT AS PRECISE AS THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT
AND SO THE ONE THAT'S TO THE EAST THAT'S BEING BISECTED BY THAT LINE.
SO IF WE COULD VISUALIZE THAT GREEN LINE JUST A LITTLE BIT TO THE LEFT IN THAT DRIVE AISLE.
FROM WHAT WE'RE SEEING ON THE DIAGRAM.
SO THERE WOULD BE CARS ESSENTIALLY PARKED ON BOTH SIDES OF THAT GREEN LINE.
SO I I'M STEPPING ON YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER RAMSON, BUT I THINK WE'RE ALL ON THE SAME PAGE.
NO, WELL THAT, THAT PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCE IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT 'CAUSE IT'S HALF AND HALF AND IT DOESN'T AFFECT THE PARKING OR REQUIRE RES STRIPING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
SO LET'S GO BACK TO THE BOTTOM RIGHT.
YOU KNOW, IF ROY, CAN YOU SPEAK INTO YOUR MIC PLEASE? OH, I'M, I'M SORRY.
I'M, YOU KNOW, I DON'T WANNA BELABOR THE POINT.
I'M JUST ASK, ASKING A SIMPLE QUESTION.
'CAUSE THE WAY YOU, WHEN YOU'RE CREATING THIS NEW PARCEL FOR THE REGAL THEATERS, UM, IT IT'S WOULD BE VERY CONVENIENT FOR IN THE FUTURE FOR REGAL THEATERS TO GO AWAY IN THIS PARCEL TO BE DEVELOPED DIFFERENTLY.
I DON'T THAT CLEARLY THEY HAVEN'T STATED THAT'S WHAT THEIR INTENTION IS RIGHT NOW, BUT WE HAVE TO LOOK ABOUT WHAT HAP CAN HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE AS A, AS A POINT OF ORDER IF WE WANTED TO HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT WHO MIGHT BE ABLE TO ABLE TO EXPAND ON THIS A LITTLE BIT.
SHOULD I OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING? YES.
SO WE'LL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND INVITE THE APPLICANT IF YOU COULD, TO COME FORWARD AND ADDRESS THAT.
[00:15:05]
GOOD EVENING.MIKE MCFARLAND REPRESENTING THE CLIENT HERE TONIGHT.
I THINK THE CONFUSION IS ASH, THAT THIS PLAN HERE THAT WE'RE SHOWING DOESN'T SHOW THE THE CURRENT SITE PLAN OF THE KRISPY KREME AND THEREFORE IT'S SHOWING THE EXISTING PARKING CONFIGURATION RIGHT NOW, BUT NOT NECESSARILY WHAT'S THERE FOR GONNA BE FOR KRISPY KREME.
SO I DIDN'T HAVE, THIS IS WHAT'S EXISTING NOW, SO THAT'S WHY WE SHOW IT THIS WAY.
SO I THINK TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION OR, UH, TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, COMMISSIONER, IS THAT THAT'S NOT GONNA BE AN ISSUE WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE NEW DESIGN OR THE NEW SITE LAYOUT AND LAID IT IN THERE THAT THOSE LINES AREN'T GONNA BE DISSECTING THOSE, UH, THOSE PARKING SPACES.
UM, FOR NOW, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMISSIONER SLAND? NO.
UM, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS STILL OPEN, SO WE, WE COULD HEAR FROM YOU AS THE APPLICANT IF YOU WISHED TO, TO ADDRESS US, UM, IN ANY WAY.
UH, WE'VE, UH, THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR A LITTLE BIT OF TIME, SO THANKS TO, UH, SONYA AND TO ASH FOR THEIR HELP WITH THIS AND, UH, LOOKING FORWARD TO GETTING THIS MOVING FORWARD.
AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW ALL OF THE PLANS THAT ARE GOING ON, BUT I KNOW THAT THERE'S A LOT GOING ON AROUND THAT, UH, THAT THEATER THERE.
UM, JUST IN CASE THERE IS ANYONE HERE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION, PLEASE COME FORWARD NOW, MAYBE THE CITY ATTORNEY.
UM, AT THIS POINT WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND I'LL CALL ON THE COMMISSION FOR ANY DISCUSSION OR A MOTION.
UM, I MEAN, COMMISSIONER RAMSON, I THINK YOU BRING UP A GOOD POINT THAT'S, YOU KNOW, WORTH US BEING MINDFUL OF WHAT, WHAT ARE YOU, WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS, YOU KNOW, HEARING THAT THAT'S NOT THE ACCURATE PARKING CONFIGURATION? WELL, I, I WOULD'VE LIKED TO HAVE SEEN A PLAN WITH THE ACCURATE CONFIGURATION, BUT IF THEY'RE ASSURING ME THAT IT'S NOT GONNA CUT THROUGH THE SPACES DIAGONALLY AND LEAVE A PART OF ONE SPACE IN ONE LOT AND ONE THE OTHER AND STAFF CAN CONFIRM THAT'S TRUE, THEN I'M, I'M FINE.
NOTHING THAT YOU WOULD SEE TO LIKE CONDITION.
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE CURRENT OWNER WANTS TO RETAIN THE PARCEL THAT KRISPY KREME IS ON.
I MEAN, SO IT STANDS TO REASON THAT THEY'D WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THEIR FUTURE TENANT IS GONNA GET ALL THE PARKING THAT THEY NEED.
SO I'M, I'M FAIRLY COMFORTABLE, UM, AT THIS POINT, BUT, YOU KNOW, JUST BASED ON THE RULES OF SELF-INTEREST,
I MEAN, COMMON SENSE YOU WOULD THINK.
I, YEAH, I I MEAN THAT MAKES SENSE, BUT I THINK BOTH MAKES SENSE.
I I, IF, IF A CAR WAS PARKED THERE ON, ON BOTH PARCELS, HALF THE CAR AND ONE PARCEL, THE OTHER HALF ON THE OTHER, AND THERE WAS, YOU KNOW, SOME TYPE OF VANDALISM OR, OR SOMETHING, I, YOU KNOW, I, I DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENS IN THAT CASE.
THAT'S, UM, NOT FOR US TO FIGURE OUT TONIGHT FOR SURE, BUT SOMETHING TO BE MINDFUL OF.
UM, I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU COMMISSIONER SLAND, IF, IF WE CAN BE ASSURED THAT THE PARKING CONFIGURATION DOESN'T KIND OF INTERSECT ANY OF THESE LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS, I'M GOOD WITH THAT.
UM, ANYBODY WANNA MAKE A MOTION? I THINK THE BEST ASSURANCE I CAN GIVE YOU IS THAT, UM, IN THE EVENT THAT REGAL THEATER GETS DEVELOPED WITH SOMETHING ELSE AT THAT TIME, THOSE DEVELOPMENT, THAT DEVELOPMENT WOULD COME BEFORE YOU EITHER, UH, DEPENDING ON WHAT THE PARKING IS AND AT THAT TIME WE WOULD MAKE SURE THAT THE PARKING FOR, IF IT'S SEPARATELY OWNED AND THE RECIPROCAL PARKING ACCESS AGREEMENT GOES AWAY OR IS ASKED TO BE TAKEN AWAY AT THAT TIME, WE WOULD ADDRESS IT.
BUT AT THIS TIME, RIGHT NOW, THE PROPERTY IS OWNED BY THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER AND THERE IS THE RECIPROCAL ACCESS AGREEMENT.
SO, UM, IT'S NOT AS MUCH AS A CONCERN TO MY BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, THE KRISPY KREME IS GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, APPROPRIATELY PLACED ON THAT PARCEL IN THE PROCESS OF THE PROJECT.
THAT WAS A BIT OF A CHALLENGE BECAUSE GETTING THE MAP IN AT THE SAME TIME THAT SOMETHING'S BEING DEVELOPED, MAKING SURE, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING PLANS AND THE DEVELOPMENT THERE HAS GONE UP PRETTY QUICKLY.
YOU KNOW, IT WAS TOUGH TO GET THE TWO LINED UP PERFECTLY, BUT I WOULD SAY IN THE FUTURE IF IT IS TWO SEPARATE PROPERTY OWNERS, WE WOULD DEFINITELY HAVE THE ABILITY TO, UH, MAKE SURE THAT THAT ISN'T AN ISSUE.
IF IT WERE, I MEAN, ONE, I GUESS AT THAT POINT THERE COULD BE ANOTHER LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT THAT MIGHT NEED TO BE MADE POTENTIALLY CORRECT.
OR JUST RE STRIPING OF THE PARKING LOT
[00:20:02]
AND THE TWO PROPERTY OWNERS COULD FIGURE THAT OUT POTENTIALLY.UM, DO WE HAVE A MOTION, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA HABER, CALIFORNIA, MAKING THE REQUIRED FINDINGS AND APPROVING LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT 24 DASH 0 0 3 TO REPOSITION A COMMON LOCK LINE BETWEEN TWO CONTIGUOUS PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AND IDAHO STREET ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 0 1 8 DASH 3 9 1 DASH THREE SEVEN AND 0 1 8 DASH 3 9 1 DASH THREE EIGHT.
AS PER THE APPROVED PLANS AND SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS AND MAKING THE DETERMINATION THAT THE PROJECT IS CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT PURSUANT TO SECTION 1 5 3 0 5 A CLASS FIVE MINOR ALTERATIONS IN LAND USE LIMITATIONS OF THE CA GUIDELINES.
DO WE HAVE A SECOND? SECOND MOTION'S BEEN MADE BY VICE CHAIRMAN HEA AND SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER CARDENAS.
EVERYONE PLEASE ENTER YOUR VOTES.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM STAFF THIS EVENING? I DON'T HAVE ANY PLANNING UPDATES, HOWEVER, I JUST LIKE TO LET THE COMMISSION KNOW.
IT'S BEEN A WONDERFUL YEAR WORKING WITH YOU AND I'D LIKE TO WISH EVERYONE A SAFE AND HAPPY HOLIDAY.
WE DO NOT PLAN ON MEETING ON THE 23RD OR DO WE, WE ACTUALLY WILL NEED TO SCHEDULE THE JANUARY 13TH, 2020 3, 20 25 MEETING.
ANY COMMENTS FROM COMMISSIONERS, COMMISSIONER SLAND? JUST WISH EVERYBODY, UH, A MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAVE FUN DURING THE HOLIDAYS.
COMMISSIONER CARDENAS? NO, VICE CHAIRMAN.
CHU, WHAT DO YOU GOT? I HAD A REALLY GOOD TIME THIS YEAR SERVING WITH YOU GUYS, UM, AND I'M REALLY LOOKING FORWARD TO, UM, THE YEAR TO COME.
SO HAPPY HOLIDAYS AND, UM, DON'T FORGET TO CHECK YOUR CITY EMAILS AND THAT'S IT.
UH, WHAT, I CAN'T EVEN USE THAT WORD IN PUBLIC.
HAPPY HOLIDAYS AND MERRY CHRISTMAS TO Y'ALL.
UM, AT THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE COMMISSION.
THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED TO MONDAY, JANUARY 13TH, 2025.