[00:00:03]
[ LA HABRA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REGULAR MEETING MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 2026 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER 100 EAST LA HABRA BOULEVARD LA HABRA, CALIFORNIA 90631 Please note that should all business not be concluded by 10:00 p.m., the Chair shall either authorize an extension of time to said meeting or continue all unfinished items to a future meeting, date certain, or date uncertain.]
RIGHT, WE'LL CALL THE PLANNING COMMISSION ORDER MEETING TO ORDER.UH, WILL EVERYBODY PLEASE RISE AND JOIN COMMISSIONER MANLEY IN THE FLAG SALUTE
READY BEGIN PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL.
EVERYBODY CAN PLEASE BE SEATED.
SO, UH, WHEN CAN WE DO THE ROLL CALL, PLEASE? VERONICA.
COMMISSIONER LOGAN CANNON HERE.
WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE PUBLIC COMMENT.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SHALL BE RECEIVED AT THE BEGINNING OF THE GOVERNING BODY MEETING AND LIMITED TO THREE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL WITH A TOTAL TIME LIMIT OF 30 MINUTES FOR ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS, UNLESS OTHERWISE MODIFIED BY THE CHAIR SPEAKING TIME AND NOT BE GRANTED IN OUR LOAN TO ANOTHER INDIVIDUAL.
FOR PURPOSES OF EXTENDING AVAILABLE SPEAKING TIME AND COMMENTS MUST BE KEPT BRIEF, NON-REPETITIVE, AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE.
THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PORTION OF THE MEETING ALLOWS THE PUBLIC TO ADDRESS ANY ITEM ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR OR A CITY BUSINESS NOT APPEARING ON THE SCHEDULED AGENDA.
PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 5 4 9 5 4 3 A SUCH COMMENTS SHALL NOT BE RESPONDED TO BY THE GOVERNING BODY DURING THE MEETING.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY WHO WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION AT THIS TIME? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT CALENDAR BEFORE THE COMMISSION.
THIS EVENING IS A CONSENT CALENDAR, WHICH CONSISTS OF THE ONE ITEM, THE MINUTES OF JULY 27TH, 2026.
DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM? NO.
I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT CALENDAR.
OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.
WILL EVERYBODY PLEASE VOTE? I'M SORRY.
CHAIR RANSON, DID YOU CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENTS? YES.
UH, AND GINGER, CAN YOU ENTER YOUR VOTES AGAIN PLEASE? SORRY.
FOUR ONE WITH COMMISSIONER CHAIR SLAN ABSTAINING.
WE'LL NOW MOVE ON TO, UH, PUBLIC HEARINGS.
SO WE HAVE, UM, ONE PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR TONIGHT.
THE PROCEDURES WILL BE AS FOLLOWS.
THE CHAIR WILL INTRODUCE THE ITEM AND THEN STAFF WILL GIVE A REPORT ON THE ITEM.
THOSE WHO WISH TO SPEAK IN FAVOR OF THE ITEM WILL BE RECOGNIZED FIRST AND THEN THE COMMISSION WILL HEAR FROM THOSE IN OPPOSITION.
REBUTTALS WILL BE ALLOWED ONLY AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR.
THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE CLOSED AND THE COMMISSION WILL DISCUSS THE MATTER AND TAKE ANY ACTIONS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE.
IF YOU WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION, PLEASE FILL OUT A SPEAKER'S CARD AND LEAVE IT AT THE PODIUM.
WHEN YOU COME FORWARD TO SPEAK, YOU'LL FIND THE SPEAKER'S CARDS ON THE TABLE AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE CHAMBER.
WHEN YOU COME FORWARD, PLEASE IDENTIFY YOURSELF AND SPELL YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS TO THE CHAIR.
THERE SHOULD BE NO DIRECTIVE CHANGES BETWEEN MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE.
PUBLIC COMMENTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO FIVE MINUTES PER INDIVIDUAL WITH A TOTAL TIME LIMIT OF 60 MINUTES FOR ALL PUBLIC COMMENTS.
FOR EACH PUBLIC HEARING ITEM ON THE AGENDA, UNLESS MODIFIED BY THE CHAIR, COMMENTS MUST BE KEPT BRIEF, NON-REPETITIVE, AND PROFESSIONAL IN NATURE.
OKAY, TONIGHT'S FIRST PUBLIC HEARING IS A DULY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 26 DASH OH OH OH SIX TO IMPLEMENT A SIGN PROGRAM FOR THE MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 1 21 EAST WOODIER BOULEVARD, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 0 1 7 DASH 2 9 3 DASH THREE FOUR.
DO WE HAVE ANY CORRESPONDENCE ON THIS ITEM? NO, WE DID NOT.
CAN WE HAVE A STAFF REPORT PLEASE? THANK YOU VERY MUCH, CHAIR.
MY NAME IS GUS GRAU, ASSISTANT PLANNER.
GOOD EVENING PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.
CUP 26 DASH 0 0 6 INVOLVES THE APPROVAL OF ASSIGNED PROGRAM FOR A MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 1 2 1 EAST WHITTIER BOULEVARD.
[00:05:01]
SITE FEATURES A COMMERCIAL BUILDING CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON A SINGLE PARCEL OF 0.8 ACRES ON WHITTIER BOULEVARD BETWEEN EUCLID STREET AND NORTH ORANGE STREET.THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING WILL CONSIST OF FOUR SUITES.
THE PARCEL WAS PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED WITH TWO SMALL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES.
THE PARCEL IS SURROUNDED BY SINGLE UNIT RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS TO THE NORTH, A MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL CENTER TO THE EAST, AN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION, AND A TOWN HOME DEVELOPMENT.
CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION TO THE SOUTH ACROSS WHITTIER BOULEVARD AND AN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION AND MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS TO THE WEST.
THE PROPOSED PROJECT INVOLVES THE APPROVAL OF SIGN CRITERIA AND DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ONE FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN, SHOWN AS 3.12 WALL SIGNS SHOWN AS 1.1 AND 1.2 AND FOUR CANOPY SIGNS SHOWN AS 2.1 THROUGH 2.4.
THE MUNICIPAL CODE STATES THAT A SIGN PROGRAM, WHICH DEVIATES FROM THE CITY'S SIGN STANDARDS, IS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF A CUP AND SHALL BE PROCESSED AS A CUP.
THE PROPOSED CANOPY SIGNS DEVIATE FROM DESIGN STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
SO THE PROJECT IS BEING PROCESSED AS A CUP, NO MODIFICATIONS ARE BEING PROPOSED TO THE BUILDING OR SITE, AND ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE WILL BE LOCATED ON THE PROJECT SITE.
THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN WILL IDENTIFY THE FOUR TENANTS OF THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING.
THE SIGN WILL BE PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE PLANTER ADJACENT TO THE PARKING LOT ENTRANCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN CONFORMS WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
THE PROPOSED LOCATION OF THE MONUMENT SIGN WILL DISPLACE A TREE THAT IS REQUIRED UNDER THE ORIGINAL PLANNING AND BUILDING APPROVALS FOR THE COMMERCIAL BUILDING.
THE PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REQUIRE THE APPLICANT TO SUBMIT A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT WILL IDENTIFY A NEW LOCATION FOR THIS TREE.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL TWO WALL SIGNS, LINES SHOWN AS 1.1 AND 1.2 ON THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING.
THE WALL SIGNS WILL BE AFFIXED TO THE BUILDING FACE.
THE PROPOSED WALL SIGNS CONFORM WITH ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE AS REQUIRED BY THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR EACH WALL SIGN WOULD BE LIMITED TO 15% OF THE TOTAL WALL HEIGHT AND THE MAXIMUM LENGTH WOULD BE LIMITED TO 75% OF THE WIDTH OF EACH TENANT'S STOREFRONT.
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO ALLOW THE SIGNS TO BE I STALLED AT ANY LOCATION IN THE APPROVED SIGN BAND AREA AS DEPICTED BY THE BLUE LINES, BUT AT A DISTANCE NO CLOSER THAN ONE HALF OF THE SIGN LETTER HEIGHT TO ANY BUILDING EDGE.
THIS MEANS THAT A SIGN WITH A LETTER HEIGHT OF THREE FEET COULD BE NO CLOSER THAN 1.5 FEET TO ANY BUILDING EDGE.
NO WALL SIGN WILL PROJECT ABOVE THE ROOF LINE.
THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING FOUR CANOPY SIGNS IDENTIFIED HERE AS SIGNS 2.1 THROUGH 2.4.
TENANTS TWO AND THREE WOULD EACH HAVE ONE CANOPY SIGN BOTH ON THE WEST ELEVATION.
TENANT FOUR WOULD HAVE TWO CANOPY SIGNS, ONE ON THE WEST ELEVATION AND ONE ON THE NORTH ELEVATION.
THE MUNICIPAL CODE REQUIRES SIGNAGE ON AWNINGS AND CANOPIES TO BE LOCATED ON THE VALANCE OF THE CANOPY IDENTIFIED.
HERE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL CANOPY SIGNAGE ON TOP OF THE CANOPIES, WHICH IS KNOWN AS THE SHED.
THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING TO CALCULATE THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA PERMITTED FOR EACH CANOPY SIGN IN THE SAME MANNER AS A WALL SIGN.
15% OF THE WALL HEIGHT, 75% OF THE WIDTH OF EACH TENANT'S DOOR.
FRONT CANOPY SIGNS COULD ALSO BE INSTALLED AT ANY LOCATION WITHIN THE BLUE SIGN BAND, BUT AT A LOCATION NO CLOSER THAN ONE HALF OF THE LETTER HEIGHT TO ANY CANOPY EDGE, WHICH MEANS THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WIDTHS RANGE FROM 19 TO 21 FEET AND THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT IS THREE FEET.
NO SIGN WILL PROJECT BEYOND A CANOPY EDGE OR ABOVE THE ROOF LINE.
STAFF RECOMMENDS THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVED THIS PROJECT SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
STAFF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS.
UH, DO ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF AT THIS TIME? OKAY, SEEING NONE, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
UH, FIRST OF WE'LL HEAR FROM THE APPLICANT IF THEY WISH TO SPEAK WITH US, AND THEN ANYBODY ELSE IN THE AUDIENCE WHICH WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT EITHER FOR OR AGAINST THIS PROJECT.
UM, AFTER ALL THE SPEAKERS HAVE SPOKEN, THEN WE WILL, UH, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE COMMISSION WILL DELIBERATE.
UH, DO WE HAVE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WISHES TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION AT THIS TIME? OKAY.
[00:10:01]
THE PUBLIC HEARING.DO WE HAVE ANY, UH, COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR I I HAVE, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.
I MEAN, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 70% AND 75%? I MEAN, REALLY, AND I KNOW, BUT LIKE, I MEAN AS FAR AS VISUALLY SPEAKING, I MEAN RIGHT, IT'S WE'RE CHANGING THE STANDARD BY OR WE'RE INCREASING THE, THE SIZE BY 5%.
IS THAT WHAT IT IS? IS, OR AM I UNDERSTANDING IT INCORRECTLY? LIKE THE, THE DID THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN WHAT THE CODE REQUIRES AND WHAT THEY'RE ASKING? IS IT LIKE A BIG DIFFERENCE? IS IT A LITTLE ITTY-BITTY DIFFERENCE? MM-HMM
AND, AND IF IT'S NOT REALLY THAT MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE, THEN WHAT'S THE POINT OF THE REQUIREMENTS? SO ARE, ARE YOU REFERRING TO THE THE CANOPY SIGNS? YES.
SO THE CODE REQUIRES UM, PERCENT YEAH, BUT THAT, UM, THAT 70% APPLIES TO THE VALANCE OF THE CANOPY, WHICH IS ESSENTIALLY THAT FRONT PORTION OF THE CANOPY NOT ON TOP OF THE CANOPY.
SO IF, IF A SIGN IS ON THE VALANCE OF THE CANOPY, THAT LARGELY DICTATES THE, THE HEIGHT WIDTH AN AREA.
SO THE CODE DOESN'T HAVE SPECIFIC DESIGN STANDARDS FOR CANOPY SIGNS INSTALLED ON TOP OF THE SHED, WHICH IS WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING HERE.
UM, WHICH WAS ONE DEVIATION WHICH, UM, REQUIRED THE, THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AS OPPOSED TO A DESIGN REVIEW.
AND, BUT WASN'T ONE OF THE OTHER CONDITIONS THAT IS REQUIRING A CUP AS THE CHANGE IN THE SIZE TO MAKE IT BIGGER THAN WHAT THE CODE WOULD ALLOW IF IT WAS ON THE VALENCE.
I'M JUST READING IT WRONG THEN ON THE, THE, THE 70% OF THE AREA OF THE VALANCE OF THESE CANOPIES WOULD BE VERY SMALL AND HARD TO READ.
UM, SO THAT'S, SEE, YOU'VE CLEARED IT UP FOR ME.
THAT, THAT CLEARS IT UP FOR ME.
'CAUSE I WAS LIKE, I AM LIKE, YEAH.
THAT CLEARED IT UP FOR ME RIGHT THERE.
DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? MY, MY OTHER COMMENT, MY ONLY COMMENT, WHICH IS NOT TOTALLY RELATED TO THE PROJECT, IS THIS DOESN'T SEEM LIKE THAT ABNORMAL OF A SIGN, BUT IT, IT KIND OF FALLS OUTSIDE OF THE STANDARD THAT WE HAVE.
UM, MAYBE, I DON'T KNOW WHEN THE LAST TIME OUR SIGNED STANDARD WAS UPDATED.
UM, THI THIS SEEMS LIKE, I MEAN, I, FOR THIS TO BE A CUP SEEMS KIND OF CRAZY, BUT IF THIS COULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE STANDARD, UM, THAT'D BE SOMETHING THAT WE COULD HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT LATER.
UM, BECAUSE YEAH, THANKS FOR CLARIFYING THAT.
COMMISSIONER MACHEKA, LIKE LOOKING AT THAT BALANCE AND THEN HEARING THE PERCENTAGES THAT WOULD BE INCREDIBLY SMALL, UH, UNREADABLE.
UM, SO WHAT WOULD, WHAT WOULD YOU DO IN THAT INSTANCE? AND, AND IT SEEMS LIKE THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD DO AND THAT LOOKS GREAT.
YEAH, I THINK THE, THE SIGNAGE LOOKS GREAT.
DOES ANYBODY WISH TO MAKE A MOTION AT THIS TIME? I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NUMBER 26 DASH 14 TO APPROVE CUP 26 DASH 0 0 6.
WHO, WHO, WHO SECONDED? GINGER.
SO COMMISSIONER MANLEY MADE THE MOTION AND COMMISSIONER LOGAN CANNON, UH, SECONDED.
UH, WILL EVERYBODY PLEASE VOTE? MOTION PASSES FIVE ZERO AND THIS WILL BECOME FINAL AND 10 WORKING DAYS UNLESS IT'S APPEALED TO CITY COUNCIL.
CONCLUDES CONCLUDES THE, UH, PUBLIC HEARING PORTION OF TONIGHT'S MEETING.
DO WE HAVE ANY COMMENTS FROM STAFF? JUST A FEW QUICK UPDATES.
THERE ARE NO ITEMS READY TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 28TH MEETING, AND THEREFORE PLEASE EXPECT THAT THE, THIS MEETING WILL BE CANCELED.
STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING ON IDENTIFYING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 18 THAT NECESSITATE A CODE CLEANUP AND WE INTEND TO PRESENT THESE CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AT YOUR UPCOMING MEETING ON OCTOBER THE 12TH.
LASTLY, STAFF WOULD JUST LIKE TO REMIND THE COMMISSION THAT THE A PA CALIFORNIA CONFERENCE IS COMING VERY SOON AND THIS EVENT WILL BE HELD OCTOBER 3RD THROUGH OCTOBER 6TH AT THE JW MARRIOTT
[00:15:01]
IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES STAFF.LOOKS FORWARD TO SEEING BOTH VICE CHAIR CARDENAS AND COMMISSIONER LOGAN CANYON THERE, AS WELL AS ANY ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONERS THAT MAY HAVE REGISTERED SEPARATELY.
UM, SO DO WE HAVE ANY ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM ANY OF THE COMMISSIONERS? YEAH, JUST TO REVISIT THAT.
IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE'RE ABLE TO JUST PASS ALONG TO STAFF TO, TO LOOK AT? AND MAYBE THIS IS TOTALLY A ONE-OFF AND, AND THAT WOULDN'T BE A GOOD USE OF STAFF RESOURCES.
I KNOW WE JUST DID MODIFY THOSE STANDARDS, BUT TO BRING SOMEBODY IN FOR A CUP FOR THAT, UM, I I, I DON'T LIKE TO SEE THAT HAPPEN.
IF WE CAN AVOID IT, UM, ADMINISTRATIVELY SOMEHOW.
THE COMMISSION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INITIATE A CODE AMENDMENT IF YOU'D LIKE TO DO SO.
UM, YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO DIRECT STAFF TO AN INITIATE CHANGES TO.
WOULD WE NEED TO IZE THAT? I'M SORRY? WOULD WE NEED TO AGENDIZE THAT? LIKE IF, IF A, A COMMISSIONER WANTS TO DIRECT STAFF TO DO THAT, UH, TYPICALLY IT WOULD TAKE, IT WOULD TAKE A SECOND COMMISSIONER SO THAT WE AT LEAST HAVE TWO MAKING THAT REQUEST.
DO WE HAVE TO DO IT NOW ON THE RECORD? YES.
IT'S NOT THE CASE IF THAT, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING.
WELL THEN MANLY IF YOU MAKE THE REQUEST, I'LL, I'LL SECOND IT.
BUT HOW SPECIFIC DO WE HAVE TO GET? DO WE HAVE TO SAY IT A CERTAIN WAY OR IS THAT GOOD ENOUGH? WELL, WE, THEY'LL, THEY, THEY'LL, THEY CAN GET BACK.
I THINK THEY UNDERSTAND WHAT COMMISSIONER MANLEY'S QUESTION.
OKAY, THEN I SECOND THE MOTION.
ALRIGHT, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND, UM, EVERYBODY IN FAVOR? OH, IT'S NOT ON FOR VOTE, CAN YOU? OKAY.
YOU, YOU WOULDN'T VOTE ON IT RIGHT NOW.
YOU'RE JUST ASKING US TO BRING IT? YEAH, WE'RE JUST VOTING ON ASKING YOU TO BRING IT.
IT'S QUITE A LITTLE BIT OF A BUREAUCRATIC PROCESS.
WE'LL BRING IT BACK TO YOU ON YOUR AGENDA SO THAT YOU CAN ALL VOTE ON THE INITIATION OF THE AMENDMENT.
BUT THIS IS JUST GETTING IT ON ANOTHER AGENDA, RIGHT? YEAH.
NOT FOR, NOT FOR SEPTEMBER 28TH.
AND, AND IF THERE'S ANY WAY THAT WE COULD SOMEHOW WORK THIS INTO THE CODE AMENDMENT THAT SONIA'S WORKING ON.
'CAUSE I THINK STAFF DOES AGREE THAT IT IS A LITTLE BIT ONEROUS.
JUST TO BE CLEAR THOUGH, IT ISN'T AN ADDITIONAL COST FOR A CUP THAT THE APPLICANT'S, UM, PAIN AND, UM, SOMETHING THAT WE COULD CONSIDER AS THIS AS BEING ONE OF OUR MCU PS WHEN WE ADOPTED THE SIGN CODE.
THE, UM, MCUP PROCESS HADN'T BEEN IDENTIFIED YET.
AND IT CERTAINLY IS SOMETHING THAT MIGHT BE BETTER FOR AN MCUP.
WE'D WANT A STAFF, MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THAT WE'D STILL WANNA BE ABLE TO APPLY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO IT.
AND, UM, AND IF THERE'S A REASON WHY A DESIGN REVIEW HAS TO COME BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION AT THE SAME RATE, WE WOULD WANT IT TREAT IT THE SAME WAY IF IT NEEDED TO GO BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
SO WE'LL TAKE A LOOK AT AND SEE THE BEST WAY THAT IF THERE'S A STREAMLINED WAY THAT WE CAN HANDLE IT, WE'LL HAND IT THAT WAY.
OTHERWISE YOU'LL SEE IT ON YOUR OCTOBER AGENDA AS AN A FORMAL INITIATION OF A CODE AMENDMENT.
ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY COMMENTS? I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT IT, I HAD A LOT OF FUN AT THE CORN FESTIVAL PARADE WITH GINGER AND DANITZA.
WE WERE IN THE COOLEST CAR, RIGHT?
SHE WAS DOING, YOU KNOW, RIGHT IN AROUND, IN THE, IN, YOU KNOW, IN THE INTERSECTIONS.
AND JASON, I'M GONNA GET YOU TO COME TO ONE OF THESE THINGS.
ONE OF THESE DAYS YOU ARE GONNA RIDE IN THE CAR WITH US.
IT WAS FROM, FROM WATCHING FROM THE SIDELINES.
I DON'T KNOW IF I'D HAVE GOTTEN IN THE CAR WITH THEM.
OH, WE WERE HAVING SO MUCH FUN.
THEY WERE HAVING TOO MUCH FUN.
SO ALL YOUR INNER CHILD SHOWS UP.
UM, SO I'D JUST LIKE TO WELCOME GUS TO THE FAMILY.
HOPE TO SEE YOU MORE OFTEN SO THAT THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED TILL OCTOBER THE 12TH, 2026.